77
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 366:
Line 366: + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 12:03, July 25, 2007
, 12:03, July 25, 2007→Take a step back
Fair enough, its a bit rich when I go on about grammar mistakes. That taken into account, my original point still stands, pedantary aside. [[User:Denzo|Denzo]] 07:16, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
Fair enough, its a bit rich when I go on about grammar mistakes. That taken into account, my original point still stands, pedantary aside. [[User:Denzo|Denzo]] 07:16, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
:You still haven't explained what is "deeply flawed". [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:50, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
:You still haven't explained what is "deeply flawed". [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:50, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
Fine:
<blockquote>
Wikipedia is feeding pornography to children
</blockquote>
Having spent a lot of time on wiki, and having looked up the reproductive articles, there is no pornography. Unless you consider educational diagrams pornography.
Oh right, you guys probably want to change science class because it refers to reproductive organs! I forgot! [[User:Denzo|Denzo]] 08:03, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
== What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? ==
== What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? ==