77
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 387:
Line 387: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 12:46, July 25, 2007
, 12:46, July 25, 2007→Take a step back
:Denzo, you still didn't explain ''what'' is "deeply flawed". Are you referring to Conservapedia itself? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:28, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
:Denzo, you still didn't explain ''what'' is "deeply flawed". Are you referring to Conservapedia itself? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:28, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
Yes. You cannot cancel a wrong and hope to make a right when you yourself go about it a wrong way. The aim is to make this place somewhere with a conservative bias. Would you prefer your children read something with any bias? I know I'd want my children to read the facts, and then make up their mind. Other people have deliberately placed bias for children to read - either it be the protocols of the learned elders of zion in Saudi Arabia or Hitlers textbooks downgrading the Jews to mere mathematical aliens. Do you realise you share a precedent with some of the most horrible regimes of the modern era? [[User:Denzo|Denzo]] 08:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
== What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? ==
== What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? ==