nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 184:
Line 184: + + + + + +
no edit summary
:What are you basing this on? She devoted entire chapters of her books to the evils of abortion. ''She campaigned against abortion.'' You don't need historical revisionism to make Sanger out as a terrible person, because she was a eugenicist and a racist. If you want to rail against [[Planned Parenthood]], I suggest [[Planned Parenthood]]. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 01:44, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
:What are you basing this on? She devoted entire chapters of her books to the evils of abortion. ''She campaigned against abortion.'' You don't need historical revisionism to make Sanger out as a terrible person, because she was a eugenicist and a racist. If you want to rail against [[Planned Parenthood]], I suggest [[Planned Parenthood]]. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 01:44, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
:Additionally, [http://www.prolifeaction.org/faq/abortion.htm#yearly this link] doesn't in any way establish that your statistic has anything to do with this article. Remember, abortion wasn't legalized in the United States until after Sanger's death. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 01:51, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
:Additionally, [http://www.prolifeaction.org/faq/abortion.htm#yearly this link] doesn't in any way establish that your statistic has anything to do with this article. Remember, abortion wasn't legalized in the United States until after Sanger's death. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 01:51, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
== Mediation of minor edit wars ==
Hello, I copied some prose from the article on [[Planned parenthood]] to the [[Margaret Sanger]] article. I have been edit warring with another editor fore two nights now. The other editor seems to be attempting to mitigate and whitewash, backing off, and then going forward. I figured that if the prose (and cites) from the locked [[Planned parenthood]] article were approved, and since they are apropos to the Margaret Sanger article, that it made sense to copy and paste. Anyway, another interested (or disinterested) view of the article is probably warranted. {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 00:18, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
*As I have instructed you, PheasantHunter, please use the article talk page. You and the other party have both run to me to intervene. I previously told you both to play nice. Andy is not the official mediator of the site, and his talk page isn't for dispute resolution when you have already been taking up the time of a Sysop. I am moving this back to the article talk page. You do not have license to post all over this site, enlisting administrators to do your bidding, is that very clear? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 04:53, 26 July 2007 (EDT)