Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
archiving
Line 810: Line 810:     
*Bohdan, I suggest that Andy has already labeled the intent of this user, and is a known Liberal, so accommodating him most likely isn't something we want to be doing, not without detailed discussion.  --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 19:56, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
 
*Bohdan, I suggest that Andy has already labeled the intent of this user, and is a known Liberal, so accommodating him most likely isn't something we want to be doing, not without detailed discussion.  --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 19:56, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
== Blocking ==
 +
 +
About 17 minutes ago you blocked a user for vandalism.  I would have blocked him for his name!  Doesn't matter, he got blocked anyway.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:26, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
:was it beelzebub? [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 21:49, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
::Yeah, that one.  :-)  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:46, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
Good thing you guys saw it, because I wouldn't have seen anything wrong with it!  --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 23:47, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Titans ==
 +
 +
Excellent help.
 +
 +
Thank you. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 23:52, 21 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==User:Independant==
 +
 +
Just wanted to say thanks for saying that about people not getting blocked for their views...I read that on Independant's page, and just got really annoyed, but decided it was worthless to say anything and get into an argument :) But I'm glad you did...I'll back you up if they comment back rudely! [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 19:00, 22 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
:I couldn't take it either.  People don't get blocked for their views! [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
 +
 +
::Yea...and what they said about TK blocking that one user for not responding...they have to understand that 1.) it never hurt anyone to be blocked for 30 minutes when they 're not doing anything except probably getting into stupid arguments, and 2.) you have to know TK and you'll understand the block better :) [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 19:04, 22 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Hey dude ==
 +
 +
How are you doing?  [[User:PheasantHunter|PheasantHunter]] 21:37, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Good.  How are you? Have we met? [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
 +
::Yeah, you do.  I just tried to email you through the CP interface, but your email is not set up.  Power to <s>the</s> Ukraine.  [[User:PheasantHunter|PheasantHunter]] 21:46, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Please unblock him ==
 +
 +
Here is a letter I wrote someone:
 +
 +
Dear Stirlatez,
 +
 +
I will send a letter to Bohdan to unblock you.  However, I don't agree that asexual reproduction should bring in the subject of morality as I don't think the life forms that practice it have any moral awareness.
 +
 +
Sincerely,
 +
 +
Conservative
 +
 +
Stirlatez wrote to me:
 +
 +
Hello Conservative,
 +
I am writing you in regards to the fact that my account on Conservapedia has been blocked by user Bohdan! I write this from my work computer, IP 150.135.169.11 and my block ID is #11831. I have been blocked by Bohdan for 'vandalism', in reference to an edit I made on the article for 'asexual reproduction' in which I rewrote the short article to include the concept that asexuality is one of the moral forms of sexuality (in contrast to homosexuality, pansexuality, pedophilia, etc.) because it naturally occurs and for many life forms is required for repopulation.
 +
 +
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:01, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
5,274

edits

Navigation menu