5,274
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 83:
Line 83: − − ==See also== − [[Holocaust denial]]
just because it is an example of denial doesn't mean it is related
Perhaps the scholarly opinion of the position is best summed by Robert E. Van Voorst:
Perhaps the scholarly opinion of the position is best summed by Robert E. Van Voorst:
:''The nonhistoricity thesis has always been controversial, and it has consistently failed to convince scholars of many disciplines and religious creeds. ... Biblical scholars and classical historians now regard it as effectively refuted.''<ref>Robert E. Van Voorst, ''Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence'' (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000), p. 16.</ref>
:''The nonhistoricity thesis has always been controversial, and it has consistently failed to convince scholars of many disciplines and religious creeds. ... Biblical scholars and classical historians now regard it as effectively refuted.''<ref>Robert E. Van Voorst, ''Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence'' (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000), p. 16.</ref>
==Notes==
==Notes==