96
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
Unless an event is common knowledge, stinging accusations need strong backup. Conservapedia isn't a soapbox for personal attacks. Sembler didn't deny the accusations and yet he's suing people who were in the program who spoke out against him? That doesn't make much sense. You'll need context. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:03, 28 July 2007 (EDT)
Unless an event is common knowledge, stinging accusations need strong backup. Conservapedia isn't a soapbox for personal attacks. Sembler didn't deny the accusations and yet he's suing people who were in the program who spoke out against him? That doesn't make much sense. You'll need context. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:03, 28 July 2007 (EDT)
:These are pretty well known accusations. Furthermore he didn't sue the kid because he was spreading lies but instead because it may harm his business interests. There have been several abuse cases brought against Sembler that have resulted in compensation payouts. Here's a couple of sources that I'm adding.
:* [http://www.thestraights.com/index.htm], blanket site set up for alleged victims of the abuse, contains testimonies, reports and links to media stories
:* [http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Charlie_Crist:_Florida_AG_and_'would-be'_governor], general story on the history of the Sembler organisation and the accusations against it
:* [http://www.webdiva.org/fox/], archive of Fox News story on the incidents
:* [http://www.melriddile.info/], another site that details the allegations of abuse
:* [http://www.isaccorp.org/archives.asp], NGO's information on the abuse allegations (scroll down to Straight)
:These are just a few site's you'll come across with a quick investigation into the matter. I'm not saying that every one of the accusations is accurate, but the fact is they are extensive and wide known. [[User:EQ|EQ]] 19:34, 28 July 2007 (EDT)