Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 351:
Line 351: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
I would appreciate your support
Just wondering if you know and could tell me the final scores of Team1 and Team2...Aschlafly and I are trying to figure out how close we came, and it would be a lot easier to just have the final numbers! Thanks, [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 17:43, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
Just wondering if you know and could tell me the final scores of Team1 and Team2...Aschlafly and I are trying to figure out how close we came, and it would be a lot easier to just have the final numbers! Thanks, [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 17:43, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
== I would appreciate your support ==
Dear TerryH,
I am sending you a note about the [[Template:Uncited|uncited template]] and how it can substantially increase web traffic to Conservapedia.
The Conservapedia article on homosexuality is now ranked in the top 10 of http://www.google.com searches. Once it climbs up to the top 5 it should attract a lot of new conservative "culture warriors" to Conservapedia.
Now a main reason why the Conservapedia homosexuality article is ranked in the top 10 is that the search engines highly reward articles with footnotes that link to other interent websites. Accordingly, since our uncited template is successful in getting people to cite their material as Andy Schlafly stated, I made note of the uncited template in the following Conservapedia articles:
Conservapedia:Commandments: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Commandments
Conservapedia Manual of Style: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style
Conservapedia:Footnotes - technical help
http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Footnotes_-_technical_help
Currently about 50% of Conservapedia articles are completely uncited and a high percentage of articles that are cited are poorly cited. If this persist, not many people are going to know about Conservapedia as our articles will be poorly ranked by the search engines.
I estimate that the Conservapedia article on homosexuality is giving 300-400 people new people a day to know about Conservapedia who wouldn't otherwise know about it. When the article is in the top 5 of the search engine rankings it will bring in SUBSTANTIALLY more as the top 5 entries get the lion's share of the internet traffic.
Accordingly, I would appreciate your efforts in supporting the [[Template:Uncited|uncited template]].
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:24, 29 July 2007 (EDT)