Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: + + + + + +
not so fast
This both expresses the point of view of those opposed to extending hate crime protections to gays, while making it clear that it is a point of view.--[[User:Epicurius|Steve]] 17:33, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
This both expresses the point of view of those opposed to extending hate crime protections to gays, while making it clear that it is a point of view.--[[User:Epicurius|Steve]] 17:33, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
:I'm not sure why that needs "clarifying". Sounds more like "diluting".
:We need to get across the point that the Homosexual Agenda wants to use ''any means possible'' to prevent Christians, et al., from declaring that (1) homosexuality is sinful and (2) homosexual behavior is 100% by choice.
:This is not the article to stick on objections or quibbles about immutablity of "orientation". There's another article about that (or should be): [[sexual orientation]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:58, 30 July 2007 (EDT)