21
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: + +
Debate:If it could be unambiguously demonstrated that man is NOT the most evolved animal, then would this support or refute ther idea of Creation by God? (view source)
Revision as of 03:35, August 2, 2007
, 03:35, August 2, 2007→Question
Or maybe God became a Buddhist."Karma Five!!" [[User:Prof0705|Prof0705]] 22:20, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
Or maybe God became a Buddhist."Karma Five!!" [[User:Prof0705|Prof0705]] 22:20, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
i believe that the human idea of god has changed with time to suit our own understanding and what we want from a God. as we cannot understand god, we look for qualities within people that we want to see in our god. therefore making god in our image and not the other way round.
==Infantile Fantasy==
==Infantile Fantasy==
Those who use the acronym "IF". Because it hasn't been unambiguously demonstrated. That's why there is a science fiction section in book stores and libraries. The research appears to... had assumed... if this is correct... are all ambiguous terms. That would be an unscientific basis for any hypothesis. Unless you live in "IF" land. In which this is merely another religious debate and not a scientific one since it involves GOD.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:14, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
Those who use the acronym "IF". Because it hasn't been unambiguously demonstrated. That's why there is a science fiction section in book stores and libraries. The research appears to... had assumed... if this is correct... are all ambiguous terms. That would be an unscientific basis for any hypothesis. Unless you live in "IF" land. In which this is merely another religious debate and not a scientific one since it involves GOD.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:14, 17 July 2007 (EDT)