5,175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 76:
Line 76: + + + + + + + +
*clears throat* ahem...
:fwiw, I do think it has a purpose as a place for people to categorize an article that they aren't sure how otherwise to categorize. That said, I wouldn't cry if it was disbanded. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 01:57, 2 August 2007 (EDT) ''<-spilled the milk...''
:fwiw, I do think it has a purpose as a place for people to categorize an article that they aren't sure how otherwise to categorize. That said, I wouldn't cry if it was disbanded. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 01:57, 2 August 2007 (EDT) ''<-spilled the milk...''
::Hey, speaking of worthless deletable categories, what about [http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Women the women category]? It seems odd to have this for the same reasons as a biography category. They can all be put somewhere else. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
::Hey, speaking of worthless deletable categories, what about [http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Women the women category]? It seems odd to have this for the same reasons as a biography category. They can all be put somewhere else. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
== *clears throat* ahem... ==
As of 11:15pm pacific time (aka GMT -8:00), there are 38 uncategorized articles, all of which require sysop intervention. By the time I finish typing this, it probably won't be true anymore, but what the hell. heheheheheh
Thanks to the others who slogged through 3100+ uncategorized articles in about 17 days. Not quite as fast as I'd hoped, but still not too shabby. BrianCo in particular really took a big chunk of them down.
So... yeah. Moving on. :) [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 02:17, 2 August 2007 (EDT) ''<-who realizes there will always be more...''