Changes

What goes into this section seems very arbitrary. Since it seems rather redundant, and almost anything that would go into it could go into some other category (i.e. Military leaders, Politicians, etc.), I propose we do away with it. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:53, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

What goes into this section seems very arbitrary. Since it seems rather redundant, and almost anything that would go into it could go into some other category (i.e. Military leaders, Politicians, etc.), I propose we do away with it. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:53, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

:I think Biographies is useful - but the other categories (i.e. Military leaders, Politicians, etc.) should be part of it. Individual articles should not have the Category:Biographies attached, they should always belong to a subcategory. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

 

:fwiw, I do think it has a purpose as a place for people to categorize an article that they aren't sure how otherwise to categorize. That said, I wouldn't cry if it was disbanded. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 01:57, 2 August 2007 (EDT) ''<-spilled the milk...''

::Hey, speaking of worthless deletable categories, what about [http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Women the women category]?  It seems odd to have this for the same reasons as a biography category.  They can all be put somewhere else. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

 

== *clears throat* ahem... ==

 

As of 11:15pm pacific time (aka GMT -8:00), there are 38 uncategorized articles, all of which require sysop intervention. By the time I finish typing this, it probably won't be true anymore, but what the hell. heheheheheh

 

Thanks to the others who slogged through 3100+ uncategorized articles in about 17 days. Not quite as fast as I'd hoped, but still not too shabby. BrianCo in particular really took a big chunk of them down.

 

So... yeah. Moving on. :) [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 02:17, 2 August 2007 (EDT) ''<-who realizes there will always be more...''