62
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 85:
Line 85: + + + + + + + +
moved
Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly"
Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly"
==Moved from TK's Talk Page==
OK, I saw that coming. I can't agree that locking the page is the correct way forward. I removed none of your content, greatly improved the article with references, gave a little balance without opinion, delinked an acronym for the term, and yet you changed it to suit yourself and locked it? I juust spent an hour working to improve the article! Please explain your motivation. [[User:BrianRobertson|BrianRobertson]] 15:05, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
*As you were warned by another Sysop, we do not allow editors, especially new ones, to decide what is re-directed, and what is re-named, and we especially don't allow new editors to take the work of an Administrator and gut it. What wiki have you used that does allow that? --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 15:07, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
I was not warned by anyone, and Crocoite agrees that MSM, being simply an acronym of Mainstream Media, should be a redirect. Would USAF not be a redirect to US Air Force? [[User:BrianRobertson|BrianRobertson]] 15:10, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
==Debate over the merge of MSM and Mainstream Media==
==Debate over the merge of MSM and Mainstream Media==
One other point: would you agree that, forgetting everything else we're discussing, MSM should be a redirect to Mainstream Media? if not, can you explain why an acronym should NOT redirect to its actual term? [[User:BrianRobertson|BrianRobertson]] 15:48, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
One other point: would you agree that, forgetting everything else we're discussing, MSM should be a redirect to Mainstream Media? if not, can you explain why an acronym should NOT redirect to its actual term? [[User:BrianRobertson|BrianRobertson]] 15:48, 2 August 2007 (EDT)