nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 75:
Line 75: + + +
→Biographies
::I think Biographies is useful - but the other categories (i.e. Military leaders, Politicians, etc.) should be part of it. Individual articles should not have the Category:Biographies attached, they should always belong to a subcategory. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
::I think Biographies is useful - but the other categories (i.e. Military leaders, Politicians, etc.) should be part of it. Individual articles should not have the Category:Biographies attached, they should always belong to a subcategory. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
:::I second that ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:04, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
:fwiw, I do think it has a purpose as a place for people to categorize an article that they aren't sure how otherwise to categorize. That said, I wouldn't cry if it was disbanded. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 01:57, 2 August 2007 (EDT) ''<-spilled the milk...''
:fwiw, I do think it has a purpose as a place for people to categorize an article that they aren't sure how otherwise to categorize. That said, I wouldn't cry if it was disbanded. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 01:57, 2 August 2007 (EDT) ''<-spilled the milk...''
::Hey, speaking of worthless deletable categories, what about [http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Women the women category]? It seems odd to have this for the same reasons as a biography category. They can all be put somewhere else. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
::Hey, speaking of worthless deletable categories, what about [http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Women the women category]? It seems odd to have this for the same reasons as a biography category. They can all be put somewhere else. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
:::TK was telling me it may be important for students doing reports on women. And since category relationships can be interdimensional, you could have a subcategory of, say, "Women Authors" under Women and the same subcategory under "Authors". It's just a question of how we want to design it. I would see women, if we decided to keep that category, as having no individual entries, but a number of sub-categories. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:04, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
== *clears throat* ahem... ==
== *clears throat* ahem... ==