nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + +
no edit summary
:See above for why I removed it. There is nothing wrong with links of conservatives who are against Ron Paul, though I will reiterate that the specific site you chose isn't a great one. (Thanks for putting it below the official links though). That site's main concern with Ron Paul is that he is not a conservative; but he never pretends to be a conservative. That would be like me placing a site on [[Barack Obama]]'s page complaining that he's not a conservative. I left the link up anyway, but I wouldn't mind keeping it only as a placeholder until we find a better one. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 18:08, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
:See above for why I removed it. There is nothing wrong with links of conservatives who are against Ron Paul, though I will reiterate that the specific site you chose isn't a great one. (Thanks for putting it below the official links though). That site's main concern with Ron Paul is that he is not a conservative; but he never pretends to be a conservative. That would be like me placing a site on [[Barack Obama]]'s page complaining that he's not a conservative. I left the link up anyway, but I wouldn't mind keeping it only as a placeholder until we find a better one. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 18:08, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
:Oh man I just took another look at the site. What I thought was the first page of posts was in fact the only page of posts. And if the name gives us a clue, it's your own site, Chippeterson. I now think there's no reason to keep this on an encyclopedia article. Feel free to find a more established blog, or better yet a news source or something to that effect. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 18:22, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
:Oh man I just took another look at the site. What I thought was the first page of posts was in fact the only page of posts. And if the name gives us a clue, it's your own site, Chippeterson. I now think there's no reason to keep this on an encyclopedia article. Feel free to find a more established blog, or better yet a news source or something to that effect. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 18:22, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
If somebody really wanted to post something against Ron Paul, they could post this. [http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2007/06/15/the_conservative_case_against_ron_paul] I'm not saying I agree with all this; I disagree with this author's opinion on an Iraq pullout, but this would be more "legitimate". [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:25, 3 August 2007 (EDT)