1,523
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: − + + +
→Conservatives against Ron Paul link
I would also like to go on record as supporting the removal of the aforementioned blog. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:27, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
I would also like to go on record as supporting the removal of the aforementioned blog. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:27, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
It's much more then just one page. On top of the blog you find pages about Ron Paul's voting record and how it differs from what he says his political views are. It should have stayed on and I would put it back up if I thought it wouldn't result in me be being blocked from writing here on conservapedia.
It's much more then just one page. On top of the blog you find pages about Ron Paul's voting record and how it differs from what he says his political views are. It should have stayed on and I would put it back up if I thought it wouldn't result in me be being blocked from writing here on conservapedia. {{unsigned|Chippeterson}}
:Ah you are correct, I didn't see those tabs at the top. Still, there are only 6 posts to the blog (it is correct to say it's your personal blog, right?). It's not the content that makes me feel this is an unacceptable source, but the authority. The blog's only two days old and it has 0 comments. It also has no credited author. I'm sure you would like your blog to be on here, but it just isn't right for an encyclopedia. (Also, it doesn't bother me, but some people around here get miffed if you don't sign your post. You can do this by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.) [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 21:55, 3 August 2007 (EDT)