nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
675
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 677:
Line 677: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 21:24, August 4, 2007
, 21:24, August 4, 2007no edit summary
<small>"And keep in mind that '''''your''''' pop culture entries are growing quickly. I've seen plenty of movies, celebrities, minor characters from fiction, etc. here, but having them does not make the articles on other topics any worse."</small> Nice to see by the use of "your" what you are here for, PortlyMort. --<font color="#0001CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAE">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 10:50, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
<small>"And keep in mind that '''''your''''' pop culture entries are growing quickly. I've seen plenty of movies, celebrities, minor characters from fiction, etc. here, but having them does not make the articles on other topics any worse."</small> Nice to see by the use of "your" what you are here for, PortlyMort. --<font color="#0001CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAE">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 10:50, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
==Example of Pro-Gay Bias==
The category allowing users to self identify as heterosexual was [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/June_2007#Category:Heterosexual_Wikipedians deleted] because it served no useful purpose, yet the exact same category for homosexuals was [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/July_2007#Category:Gay_Wikipedians kept]. We should add this to the list.[[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 17:24, 4 August 2007 (EDT)