35
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25:
Line 25: + +
→Ideological Edits....
*Take great care in name calling, okay? Remember this is not Wikipedia, we are a ''Christian and Conservative friendly'' encyclopedia, and are not striving for NPOV wherein Conservative and Christian thought is denigrated to make way for revisionist thinking. Like the ratings deal...Apples and Oranges comparison, and O'Reilly is up, not down, across the board. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 22:23, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
*Take great care in name calling, okay? Remember this is not Wikipedia, we are a ''Christian and Conservative friendly'' encyclopedia, and are not striving for NPOV wherein Conservative and Christian thought is denigrated to make way for revisionist thinking. Like the ratings deal...Apples and Oranges comparison, and O'Reilly is up, not down, across the board. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 22:23, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
----
I understand that this is a conservative site, but that shouldn't stop it from using facts. Chris Matthews has always had a successful job, and many journalists do actually look up to him. The O'reilly factor actually is down, I'm not making that up. And MSNBC is beating CNN in ratings. These are "FACTS", not opinions. I want to help this site, not hurt it. So please allow me correct these articles, and help make conservapedia a better site. :) - Captainalpha1