Changes

=== Objections ===

=== Objections ===

The obvious objections that secular historians have against Ussher's chronology follow from their notion that the earth is 4.6 billion years old and not merely six thousand or so years old. That, however, is a purely philosophical objection--and indeed, [[young earth creationism|young earth creationists]] have by now assembled a powerful body of evidence that the earth indeed could not be much older than Ussher calculated it to be.

The obvious objections that secular historians have against Ussher's chronology follow from their notion that the earth is 4.6 billion years old and not merely six thousand or so years old. That, however, is a purely philosophical objection{{fact}}--and indeed, [[young earth creationism|young earth creationists]] have by now assembled a powerful{{fact}} body of evidence that the earth indeed could not be much older than Ussher calculated it to be{{fact}}.

The Biblical objections are more serious, however. They turn on Ussher's interpretation of certain passages, such as {{Bible ref|book=Galatians|chap=3|verses=17|version=NASB}} and {{Bible ref|book=Ezekiel|chap=4|verses=5|version=NASB}}, that separate certain key events in Hebrew history. Happily, Ussher left copious notes detailing his methods and his arguments. Today [[Larry Pierce]],<ref>[[Larry Pierce|Pierce, Larry]], "The Forgotten Archbishop," Appendix B of James Ussher, ''[[The Annals of the World]],'' Larry and Marion Pierce, eds., Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 2003, pp. 891-2, ISBN 0890513600</ref> who undertook to translate the ''Annals'' into English from their original [[Latin]], has prepared vigorous defenses of Ussher and his work. While not all of Ussher's calculations might be able to stand (see [[Biblical chronology dispute]] for details), his notes at least inform modern readers of the basis of his calculations and enable them to construct a Biblical corrective.

The Biblical objections are more serious, however. They turn on Ussher's interpretation of certain passages, such as {{Bible ref|book=Galatians|chap=3|verses=17|version=NASB}} and {{Bible ref|book=Ezekiel|chap=4|verses=5|version=NASB}}, that separate certain key events in Hebrew history. Happily, Ussher left copious notes detailing his methods and his arguments. Today [[Larry Pierce]],<ref>[[Larry Pierce|Pierce, Larry]], "The Forgotten Archbishop," Appendix B of James Ussher, ''[[The Annals of the World]],'' Larry and Marion Pierce, eds., Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 2003, pp. 891-2, ISBN 0890513600</ref> who undertook to translate the ''Annals'' into English from their original [[Latin]], has prepared vigorous defenses of Ussher and his work. While not all of Ussher's calculations might be able to stand (see [[Biblical chronology dispute]] for details), his notes at least inform modern readers of the basis of his calculations and enable them to construct a Biblical corrective.