Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New page: In ''ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish'', 490 U.S. 605 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court restated the Rooker-Feldman doctrine that 28 U. S. C. § 1257 ordinarily bars direct review in the lower f...
In ''ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish'', 490 U.S. 605 (1989), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] restated the [[Rooker-Feldman doctrine]] that 28 U. S. C. § 1257 ordinarily bars direct review in the lower federal courts of a decision reached by the highest state court, because such authority is vested solely in the [[U.S. Supreme Court]]. See ''District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman'', 460 U.S. 462 (1983); ''Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers'', 398 U.S. 281, 296 (1970); ''Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.'', 263 U.S. 413, 415-416 (1923).
[[category:US Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:US Supreme Court Cases]]