277
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 77:
Line 77: + +
Debate:Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless. (view source)
Revision as of 00:44, August 9, 2007
, 00:44, August 9, 2007no edit summary
:Did you ever stop to think that Genesis 1 describes the Creation, while Genesis 2 just goes into a little more detail as to what happened? Unless of course it's your opinion that it just has to contradict itself... [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:33, 28 June 2007 (EDT)
:Did you ever stop to think that Genesis 1 describes the Creation, while Genesis 2 just goes into a little more detail as to what happened? Unless of course it's your opinion that it just has to contradict itself... [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:33, 28 June 2007 (EDT)
::There is only one account given of the Creation in the book of Genesis. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." -Genesis 1:1. It is literal and chronological. What apparently has confused you is the recounting of it in Genesis 2 which is merely an account from a second perspective. Which is why it gives the precondition of: "This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created." -Genesis 2:4. Two perspectives of one event. Now that wasn't hard at all, was it? Why are there two pespectives given here? Well, you'll just have to read the rest of it yourself in order to fully understand that enigma.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 20:44, 8 August 2007 (EDT)