5,175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 135:
Line 135: + +
→Political People
*As Ed Poor has stated, some articles, that do not fit into the main ones, can do without categories. In other words, not every article must have one. But in the example you gave, I would say Political Activists, or Traitors would do. :p --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 22:48, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
*As Ed Poor has stated, some articles, that do not fit into the main ones, can do without categories. In other words, not every article must have one. But in the example you gave, I would say Political Activists, or Traitors would do. :p --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 22:48, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
::I find it hard to believe that an article can't be categorized in a general fashion into SOME category or other. It may happen, but honestly I think the only problem would be a (temporary, you'd hope) lack of robustness in a cat. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 10:29, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
== Speaking of "US" ==
== Speaking of "US" ==