Changes

::::::Although I couldn't previously see anything grammatically incorrect, I'll now concede that it ''might'' be grammatically incorrect (i.e. I'm not, in this case, going to plead that it's an American/Australian difference, although that ''might'' be the case).  I'm happy to change the wording to include the word "they", for added clarity if nothing else.  Would you be satisfied with that change?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:56, 8 August 2007 (EDT)

::::::Although I couldn't previously see anything grammatically incorrect, I'll now concede that it ''might'' be grammatically incorrect (i.e. I'm not, in this case, going to plead that it's an American/Australian difference, although that ''might'' be the case).  I'm happy to change the wording to include the word "they", for added clarity if nothing else.  Would you be satisfied with that change?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:56, 8 August 2007 (EDT)

Gentlemen, I've been staying out of this area a lot, but I offer one observation. We need to make the articles ''intelligible'' both to the 45 percent of Americans who believe that God created plants, animals and Human Beings in their present form around 10,000 years ago - as well as to the 50 percent who believe that life "evolved" (with or without God's help) over a period of millions of years.

Gentlemen, I've been staying out of this area a lot, but I offer one observation. We need to make the articles ''intelligible'' both to the 45 percent of Americans who believe that God created plants, animals and Human Beings in their present form around 10,000 years ago - as well as to the 50 percent who believe that life "evolved" (with or without God's help) over a period of millions of years.