96
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 46:
Line 46: + +
Talk:Essay:Evolution is an unproved theory (view source)
Revision as of 23:57, August 9, 2007
, 23:57, August 9, 2007no edit summary
If so, please do so. State the name of the "proven" theory, state what observations this theory explains, state the mechanisms that this theory claims to be responsible for the observations and cite the relevant "proof". --[[User:Dimensio|Dimensio]] 11:43, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
If so, please do so. State the name of the "proven" theory, state what observations this theory explains, state the mechanisms that this theory claims to be responsible for the observations and cite the relevant "proof". --[[User:Dimensio|Dimensio]] 11:43, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
:Agreed with the above, the current theory of gravity is unproven, the theory of light is not only unproven but in some cases contradictory (dual wave/particle model), even our understanding of how volcanoes work is just a theory, to the best of my knowledge we have never actually observed the convection of the mantle. But we accept these theories, why? Because they are the ones which best fit the observations. The same with evolution, it is the best theory which fits the observations, while it does make postulations this is simply a fact of science, Galileo made assumptions about the uniformity of acceleration due to gravity while investigating the principle of relativity and projectiles, assumptions which were only proven correct after his theories was presented and assumptions which were only made because they fitted the observations that were made. [[User:EQ|EQ]] 19:57, 9 August 2007 (EDT)