12
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 247:
Line 247: + + + + + +
→Errors in the article
Thanks [[User:Jstanierm|Jstanierm]] 16:18, 10 August 2007 (EDT)
Thanks [[User:Jstanierm|Jstanierm]] 16:18, 10 August 2007 (EDT)
::We've got plenty of the 'Socialist' POV in here, and this article isn't going to be taken over by competing factions in sectartian dispute with each other. We want what comes nearest to reflecting what the historical record shows. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 16:36, 10 August 2007 (EDT)
::We've got plenty of the 'Socialist' POV in here, and this article isn't going to be taken over by competing factions in sectartian dispute with each other. We want what comes nearest to reflecting what the historical record shows. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 16:36, 10 August 2007 (EDT)
:::Hi, RobS, I appreciate your attention to this article. You are disturbing me, however, by refusing to cite your sweeping generalizations by simply assigning statements to "critics of socialism."
:::Also, you refuse to engage me intellectual you come off as very aggressive and denigrating. Your responses to my comments range from "That arguments going no where" to "[I] don't really give a rip." For the statements I presume you would agree with me you simply claim they were put in by "fellow travelers." If this is true then I trust you would in a spirit of seeking the truth edit these claims.
:::You are being very unreasonable and are failing to use any form of argument or logic to defend these outrageous claims. I would appreciate a little more humility. [[User:Jstanierm|Jstanierm]] 16:44, 10 August 2007 (EDT)