Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
651 bytes added ,  22:14, August 11, 2007
→‎Reversion: reply re: liberal correlation
Line 237: Line 237:     
Every single example of deceict (except maybe that Dutch art forger) is of a liberal.  Every time someone posts an example of conservative decption, it's deleated, with an explanation that it's a 'scandal' or a 'lie', but not 'deception.'  Isn't is slightly deceptive to only include the deceit of one side of the political spectrum?  Just my two cents. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 17:47, 11 August 2007 (EDT)
 
Every single example of deceict (except maybe that Dutch art forger) is of a liberal.  Every time someone posts an example of conservative decption, it's deleated, with an explanation that it's a 'scandal' or a 'lie', but not 'deception.'  Isn't is slightly deceptive to only include the deceit of one side of the political spectrum?  Just my two cents. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 17:47, 11 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Some [[liberals]] delight in [[deceit]], and they have succeeded in driving morality out of [[public schools]].  So it's not surprising that many major examples are about [[liberals]].  But I don't claim that "every single example" is about [[liberals]].  You seem to be drawing that conclusion.
 +
 +
: Provide a [[conservative]] example of similar magnitude and it will remain there.  But please don't simply post a scandal that is not really deceit, or an insignificant example.
 +
 +
: Surely you don't expect [[deceit]] to occur as often by people who teach that it is wrong as those who don't.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:14, 11 August 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu