3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: + +
Debate:Is Conservapedia a 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia'? (view source)
Revision as of 15:33, August 14, 2007
, 15:33, August 14, 2007→AGAINST
OK, another suggestion, in support of being reasonable. I would have no debate with you or your project WHATSOEVER, if you would simply change the main page and stop claiming you are an Encyclopedia. Why not call yourself 'Conservapedia - a Young Earth Creationist Database', or something similar? [[User:50something|50something]]
OK, another suggestion, in support of being reasonable. I would have no debate with you or your project WHATSOEVER, if you would simply change the main page and stop claiming you are an Encyclopedia. Why not call yourself 'Conservapedia - a Young Earth Creationist Database', or something similar? [[User:50something|50something]]
///It should be noted that not even Wikipedia is viable as a scholarly source. I.E. it should never cited in any kind of research. With that said I think a good rule is to not even CONSIDER using conservapedia as any kind of factual outlet. Also I wouldn't trust anyone who bites the hand that feeds them. I.E. smearing wikipedia while using mediawiki as the website base. That's just hypocritical.///