140
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 55:
Line 55: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Template talk:Examples of Liberal Bias (view source)
Revision as of 18:19, August 15, 2007
, 18:19, August 15, 2007Liberal style?
::: How does your conclusion follow from what I said? Maybe you're being facetious at this point. I was clear that [[liberals]], like any group that shares common beliefs, share some similar characteristics of style also. It shouldn't offend anyone to list some of those characteristics.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:32, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
::: How does your conclusion follow from what I said? Maybe you're being facetious at this point. I was clear that [[liberals]], like any group that shares common beliefs, share some similar characteristics of style also. It shouldn't offend anyone to list some of those characteristics.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:32, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
== Liberal style? ==
Mr. Schlafly, I have a few issues with some of your "liberal characteristics", specifically that it seems like you yourself exhibit many of them in your discussions/debates. Here are a few of the examples that I have found:
2. Pretending to know more than he does.
example: In your discussion of the Kevorkian speaker article on the main talk page you say "Those many liberals probably received fees ten (10) times greater what the few conservatives received in fees." You have absolutely know justification for this statement.
5. Insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate.
example: I, as well as many others, have noticed that you frequently end discussion of debate topics by accusing whoever you are debating with of being a liberal and refusing to continue the discussion at all.
7. Over-reliance on accusations of hypocrisy.
example: See the article on "Liberal hypocrisy".
9. Insistence on censoring certain speech.
example: Just look at the large number of people who have been blocked (which might end up including me unfortunately) for holding opposing viewpoints.
15. Claim that science supports their position, and ignore any evidence that shows their science to be flawed.
example: See conservapedia articles and debates on evolution, young earth creationism, etc. Nearly all arguments for young earth creationist ideas contain the phrase "young earth creationists assert" without providing any sort of evidence or support.
So I was wondering what your response to all of this is. Do I have a point or am I missing something? And for the record (and in anticipation of your response) no I am not a liberal, so please do not stoop to calling me one like it is an insult or as if it somehow makes your point for you. I simply feel that if you are going to criticize liberals for these characteristics you should first make sure that you yourself do not engage in any of the same practices. --[[User:BillOhannity|BillOhannity]] 14:19, 15 August 2007 (EDT)