325
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 69:
Line 69: + +
Talk:Irreducible complexity (view source)
Revision as of 03:25, August 16, 2007
, 03:25, August 16, 2007→Behe's flawed argument: Page locked
:If some Creationists wish Behe would just shut up, I'd like to know more about it. Perhaps it would be material for a broad article on [[Science and religion]]. I'm a student of science and also a religious man, hence my interest. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:09, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:If some Creationists wish Behe would just shut up, I'd like to know more about it. Perhaps it would be material for a broad article on [[Science and religion]]. I'm a student of science and also a religious man, hence my interest. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:09, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
==Typos, errors==
Double "the" after the title of the book ''No Free Lunch''; Fifth paragraph, second word should be complexity, (extra "o"); In the second quote the phrase "speciality journals" might be better rendered "specialty" (no "i"). [[User:Samwell|Samwell]] 23:25, 15 August 2007 (EDT)