Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
229 bytes added ,  23:53, August 16, 2007
→‎Drought: Agreed.
Line 58: Line 58:     
:::::So a QLD real estate page proves that the floods in Melbourne have stopped the drought?  Firstly have you considered that some real estate agents might actually misrepresent how something looks! (SHOCK!) Have you considered looking at the BOM page [http://www.bom.gov.au] to look at rainfall patterns or dam levels - Melbourne's dams are at less than 30% capacity at the moment - this time last year they were over 50%.  Hobart is the only major city in Australia with dams at levels that are considered to be capable of maintaining the population for a prolonged period of time.  I am in Melbourne, I can see the effects of drought every day, admittedly less in winter than they were five months ago but still there.  Where are you?--[[User:Bilby|Bilby]] 18:38, 16 August 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::So a QLD real estate page proves that the floods in Melbourne have stopped the drought?  Firstly have you considered that some real estate agents might actually misrepresent how something looks! (SHOCK!) Have you considered looking at the BOM page [http://www.bom.gov.au] to look at rainfall patterns or dam levels - Melbourne's dams are at less than 30% capacity at the moment - this time last year they were over 50%.  Hobart is the only major city in Australia with dams at levels that are considered to be capable of maintaining the population for a prolonged period of time.  I am in Melbourne, I can see the effects of drought every day, admittedly less in winter than they were five months ago but still there.  Where are you?--[[User:Bilby|Bilby]] 18:38, 16 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
::::::Agreed.  I'm also wondering what the (alleged) situation in Queensland does to show that there's no drought here in Melbourne.  It's got me stumped.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:53, 16 August 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu