37
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + +
Debate:Which is better: science or religion? (view source)
Revision as of 02:31, August 19, 2007
, 02:31, August 19, 2007no edit summary
Religion is better. Or atleast should be better for all Christians. The very first comandment is never to put any God before me. Which means do not idolize anything besides God.
Religion is better. Or atleast should be better for all Christians. The very first comandment is never to put any God before me. Which means do not idolize anything besides God.
Colest touches on an arguement i can say "amen" to, while this last comment is one reason why scientists are constantly at odds with theologians. Science and Religion are mutually, and beautifully, compatable. Scientists should recgonize that science consists of theories- not fact, but theories that have varying levels of proof. Thus, the scientists need to allow for other possibilities and not be so dogmatic. Theologians, or all religious individuals, should recgonize that science is nothing more than an effort to characterize God's world in a systematic manner, without using faith (or the bible) as a source of information. God created scientists, liberals, and everyone you disagree with; possibly to engender the advances in medicine and technology that we all enjoy. It is important that science and religion coexist together. Each of the two provides meaning and clarity to those who ascribe to their philosophies. Scientists need to recgonize and respect that some people have faith that they lack. People of faith have to recgonize, and accept- as I truly believe God does- individuals who choose to not believe in God. --[[User:Jsusman|Jsusman]] 22:31, 18 August 2007 (EDT)