Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
875
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: + +
Talk:United States presidential election, 2000 (view source)
Revision as of 08:10, August 19, 2007
, 08:10, August 19, 2007→Plurality of popular vote
::::Now, can you blame anyone for being suspicious of the (a) the information you place, (b) the methods of how you do it, and (c) your arguments and reasoning? [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 11:23, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
::::Now, can you blame anyone for being suspicious of the (a) the information you place, (b) the methods of how you do it, and (c) your arguments and reasoning? [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 11:23, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
:::::To maybe allay your suspicions of me, here's an interesting story. I was taught politics at high school by a chap who I would rate as the best and most interesting teacher I came across in school or university. His area of research was the US political system and how it contrasts with the UK system, and he managed to pass on a great interest to me in both. He has gone on to become rather well known in British educational circles. He had some close contacts in the political world, including one former UK Prime Minister who would come and talk to us each year. And for those lucky enough to go on the end of year trip to Washington, there was a meeting with a Republican Representative who was a good friend of the teacher but who I admit I didn't know much about at the time. His name was Dick Cheney. Doesn't prove anything I suppose! [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 04:10, 19 August 2007 (EDT)
==LePore==
==LePore==