Block
1,976
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 277:
Line 277: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 05:31, August 20, 2007
, 05:31, August 20, 2007→Example of Pro-Gay Bias
*I agree. Added. That entire list has many interesting items. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 17:42, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
*I agree. Added. That entire list has many interesting items. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 17:42, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
*Wow. Unbelievable! How can anyone argue now that there is no liberal bias on Wiki in light of that? [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 01:31, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
I disagree. If anything, having only a "homosexual" group brands them as abnormal, as everyone else is assumed to be normal and heterosexual. There's a homosexual group without a heterosexual group for the same reason that there are gay bars but not "straight bars". All bars are by default assumed straight, and so are editors. It's an interesting case of what could possibly be bias, but it's not really pro-gay.
I disagree. If anything, having only a "homosexual" group brands them as abnormal, as everyone else is assumed to be normal and heterosexual. There's a homosexual group without a heterosexual group for the same reason that there are gay bars but not "straight bars". All bars are by default assumed straight, and so are editors. It's an interesting case of what could possibly be bias, but it's not really pro-gay.