439
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 310:
Line 310: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 15:38, August 20, 2007
, 15:38, August 20, 2007Many edits by involved parties.
Sometimes something becomes so broken that it makes more sense just to throw it out and get something new. Wikipedia, with all its bias and gossip and pornography and leadership trying to profit from a new search engine, is at that point. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:47, 17 August 2007 (EDT)
Sometimes something becomes so broken that it makes more sense just to throw it out and get something new. Wikipedia, with all its bias and gossip and pornography and leadership trying to profit from a new search engine, is at that point. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:47, 17 August 2007 (EDT)
== Many edits by involved parties. ==
Recent software Wikiscanner has found that many interested parties have edited their own Wikipedia articles and not been caught. See [http://computerworld.com/blogs/node/6052] [http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/19/business/wiki.php] [http://www.independent.ie/lifestyle/wikipedia-and-the-art-of-censorship-1062639.html] [http://www.itwire.com/content/view/14054/53/]. Even the liberals happy about this [http://uruknet.info/?p=m35491&s1=h1]!