Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 318: Line 318:     
It's about time to add a few new examples to the list here.  Please make suggestions here.  A point about the new attorney, apparently liberal, who has taken the helm is appropriate, and his callous attitude towards the smears and gossips (while editing his own entry).  Another point about the anti-Christian entries is needed.  An update about how the leadership of Wikipedia is trying to cash in on the traffic with their for-profit search engine may be appropriate.  Other suggestions?  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:06, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
 
It's about time to add a few new examples to the list here.  Please make suggestions here.  A point about the new attorney, apparently liberal, who has taken the helm is appropriate, and his callous attitude towards the smears and gossips (while editing his own entry).  Another point about the anti-Christian entries is needed.  An update about how the leadership of Wikipedia is trying to cash in on the traffic with their for-profit search engine may be appropriate.  Other suggestions?  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:06, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
I was just about to point out link 14 above after noticing it as a major headline on a news site. The fact that US government computers have been caught editing Wikipedia articles on subjects relevant to their work (i.e. Iraq War, Guantanamo Bay) implies that they are using Wikipedia as a government propaganda tool. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:06, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781

edits

Navigation menu