614
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 56:
Line 56: − +
→Strong atheism is illogical
This means that you would have to be [[omnipresent]]. You would also have to know everything about every part of the universe, so you would be [[omniscient]]. Then, just at the point when you proved that there was no God, you would also have proven that you were one.<ref>http://www.kennedycommentary.org/default.asp?pg=topicmessage&id=1419</ref>}}
This means that you would have to be [[omnipresent]]. You would also have to know everything about every part of the universe, so you would be [[omniscient]]. Then, just at the point when you proved that there was no God, you would also have proven that you were one.<ref>http://www.kennedycommentary.org/default.asp?pg=topicmessage&id=1419</ref>}}
Strong atheists typically respond that their strong atheism is based on logical flaws inherent in the concept of God; thus, they argue, they don't have to ''see'' that God does not exist, because it is logically ''impossible'' for God to exist.
Strong atheists typically respond that their strong atheism is based on logical flaws inherent in the concept of God; thus, they argue, they don't have to ''see'' that God does not exist, because it is logically ''impossible'' for God to exist. Theists, in turn, typically criticize the alleged logical contradictions in the concept of God. See [[strong atheism]] for a more thorough discussion.
===Reason===
===Reason===