1,523
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + +
Keep up the good work
{{Welcome|sig=<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:46, 23 August 2007 (EDT)}}
{{Welcome|sig=<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:46, 23 August 2007 (EDT)}}
== Keep up the good work ==
I saw your comment on [[talk:liberal]]. Don't get discouraged by that; they have a TON of vandals around here and sometimes it puts the sysops on edge. I actually read an article last year in the New York Times about the type of Conservative you were talking about (I forget where they were... some prairy state). I found it very interesting, in terms of political theory. Even the more "advanced" views on political specra -- or more pragmatically the big political analysts -- don't really have a way to cope for "red blooded environmentalists". It's a question that could become very important in next year's election, at least for certain parts of America.
Wow sorry this was longer than I intended, but I just wanted to tell you to keep making good faith edits and the editors really do get defensive. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 17:39, 24 August 2007 (EDT)