Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − +
moved cat
In ''Schriro v. Summerlin'', 542 U.S. 348 (2004), held that ''[[Ring v. Arizona]]'', 536 U.S. 584 (2002), which extended Apprendi's jury trial requirement to the aggravating circumstances that make a defendant eligible for the death penalty, is not retroactive for other cases because deprivation of the jury trial right does not seriously diminish the accuracy of a criminal proceeding.
In ''Schriro v. Summerlin'', 542 U.S. 348 (2004), held that ''[[Ring v. Arizona]]'', 536 U.S. 584 (2002), which extended Apprendi's jury trial requirement to the aggravating circumstances that make a defendant eligible for the death penalty, is not retroactive for other cases because deprivation of the jury trial right does not seriously diminish the accuracy of a criminal proceeding.
[[category:US Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]