Changes

This case presents a question to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] about child [[pornography]] and [[commercial free speech]]:<ref>

This case presents a question to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] about child [[pornography]] and [[commercial free speech]]:

*Whether 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(3)(B) is overbroad and impermissibly vague, and thus facially unconstitutional, when the statute prescribes punishment for one who "knowingly advertises, promotes, presents, distributes, or solicits ... any material or purported material in a manner that reflects the belief, or that is intended to cause another to believe, that the material or purported material is or contains" illegal child pornography.

*Whether 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(3)(B) is overbroad and impermissibly vague, and thus facially unconstitutional, when the statute prescribes punishment for one who "knowingly advertises, promotes, presents, distributes, or solicits ... any material or purported material in a manner that reflects the belief, or that is intended to cause another to believe, that the material or purported material is or contains" illegal child pornography.