nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: +
Talk:Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (view source)
Revision as of 22:44, August 26, 2007
, 22:44, August 26, 2007no edit summary
::You may wish to actually notice there is a source before writing. That information is well documented. It's only been around for 2 millennia... I am serious that you need to study more. That you didn't know this and the concept is foreign to you is unfortunate. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:36, 25 August 2007 (EDT)
::You may wish to actually notice there is a source before writing. That information is well documented. It's only been around for 2 millennia... I am serious that you need to study more. That you didn't know this and the concept is foreign to you is unfortunate. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:36, 25 August 2007 (EDT)
::Yes, I know you put a source. Thank you, that is all I was asking for. I was making the point that you shouldn't have put what seems like opinion in the article without sourcing it in the first place. This is basic stuff, you shouldn't have to be reminded. However, I still don't understand what you are trying to argue. You know the 300's and 400's is the same as the 4th and 5th century right? [[User:GodWarrior|GodWarrior]] 12:05, 25 August 2007 (EDT)
::Yes, I know you put a source. Thank you, that is all I was asking for. I was making the point that you shouldn't have put what seems like opinion in the article without sourcing it in the first place. This is basic stuff, you shouldn't have to be reminded. However, I still don't understand what you are trying to argue. You know the 300's and 400's is the same as the 4th and 5th century right? [[User:GodWarrior|GodWarrior]] 12:05, 25 August 2007 (EDT)
:::But the source was in before I even wrote on this talk page. I was questioning why you would think it was opinion when it is already common knowledge in the field. I don't especially like providing a source in this case, as it makes it seem that this is the view of one work, when in fact it is not. Fact citations are usually used if one believes the information is false, hence I commented above. Based upon the hole in your knowlegdge in this area, I wanted to make sure you were aware the 4th and 5th century were the 300s and 400s. There was also the chance putting it in that form for you might spur your recollection of when Christianity became legal and their works were no longer burned, if you had read that sometime in your past. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 18:44, 26 August 2007 (EDT)