Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
formatting
Line 1: Line 1:  
This case presents a question to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] concerning [[judges]] and [[elections]]:<ref>Bd. of Educ. v. Tom F., No. 06-637. Certiorari granted Feb. 26, 2007. Ruling below: 193 Fed. Appx. 26 (2d Cir. 2006).</ref>
 
This case presents a question to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] concerning [[judges]] and [[elections]]:<ref>Bd. of Educ. v. Tom F., No. 06-637. Certiorari granted Feb. 26, 2007. Ruling below: 193 Fed. Appx. 26 (2d Cir. 2006).</ref>
   −
*Does the holding of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, stating that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act permits tuition reimbursement where a child has not previously received special education from a public agency, stand in direct contradiction to the plain language of 20 U.S.C. §
+
*Does the holding of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, stating that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act permits tuition reimbursement where a child has not previously received special education from a public agency, stand in direct contradiction to the plain language of 20 U.S.C. § 1412(a)(10)(C)(ii) which authorizes tuition reimbursement to the parents of a disabled child “who previously received special education and related services under the authority of a public agency”?
1412(a)(10)(C)(ii) which authorizes tuition reimbursement to the parents of a disabled child “who previously received special education and related services
  −
under the authority of a public agency”?
      
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu