Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Homosexual Agenda (view source)

Revision as of 06:11, March 12, 2007

633 bytes added ,  06:11, March 12, 2007
→‎WOV's got a point
Line 8: Line 8:     
I have cleaned up biased and vitriolic language as best as I can, but this entry deserves deletion.
 
I have cleaned up biased and vitriolic language as best as I can, but this entry deserves deletion.
 +
 +
 +
: I didn't see anything "hateful" in it.  The Scalia reference was not intended to be about what is binding law, obviously.  There was nothing binding about his phrase.  I'll note that it was in dissent.
 +
 +
: The edits to this article were completely inappropriate, turning it into a liberal puff piece.  Wikipedia exists for that.  Actually, your edits made this even more liberal than Wikipedia's article on the same topic!
 +
 +
: The hour is very late and I need to lock this page to guard against vandalism or conversion to a liberal message.  I can unlock tomorrow.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 02:11, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,552

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/27816"

Navigation menu