Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
174 bytes removed ,  03:49, August 27, 2007
→‎Attempts to Dilute the Definition of Atheism: no need to have same paper uoted multiple time in one paragraph
Line 31: Line 31:     
[[Image:Scale.jpg‎|thumb|right|150px|Since 1979 the proponents of atheism have made a concerted effort to redefine atheism in order to shift the burden of proof.]]  
 
[[Image:Scale.jpg‎|thumb|right|150px|Since 1979 the proponents of atheism have made a concerted effort to redefine atheism in order to shift the burden of proof.]]  
−
Since 1979 proponents of atheism have often been attempting to dilute the definition of atheism to mean a mere [[agnosticism|lack of belief]] there is a God or gods. <ref>http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm</ref> One of the reasons why some proponents of atheism have been attempting to dilute the definition of the term atheism is to shift the burden of proof regarding the existence of God. <ref>http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm</ref>
+
Since 1979 proponents of atheism have often been attempting to dilute the definition of atheism to mean a mere [[agnosticism|lack of belief]] there is a God or gods. One of the reasons why some proponents of atheism have been attempting to dilute the definition of the term atheism is to shift the burden of proof regarding the existence of God.  
   −
In the article, ''Is Atheism Presumptuous''?, atheist [[Jeffery Jay Lowder]], a founder of [[Internet Infidels]], states that "I agree [with Copan] that anyone who claims, "God does not exist," must shoulder a burden of proof just as much as anyone who claims, "God exists." <ref>http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm</ref> In short, the attempt to redefine atheism is a merely an attempt to make no assertions so no facts need be offered. <ref>http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm</ref>  The attempt to redefine atheism, however, is not in accordance with the standard definitions of atheism that encyclopedias of philosophy employ which is that atheism is a denial of the existence of God or gods. <ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/</ref><ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1998</ref><ref>http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm</ref>   
+
In the article, ''Is Atheism Presumptuous''?, atheist [[Jeffery Jay Lowder]], a founder of [[Internet Infidels]], states that "I agree [with Copan] that anyone who claims, "God does not exist," must shoulder a burden of proof just as much as anyone who claims, "God exists." In short, the attempt to redefine atheism is a merely an attempt to make no assertions so no facts need be offered. The attempt to redefine atheism, however, is not in accordance with the standard definitions of atheism that encyclopedias of philosophy employ which is that atheism is a denial of the existence of God or gods. <ref>http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm</ref> <ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/</ref><ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1998</ref><ref>http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm</ref>   
    
The standard definition of atheism given by encyclopedias of philosophy which is the denial of the existence of God is a definition more in accordance with the biblical view of atheism.  Specifically, the Bible teaches that the creation clearly testifies of God and the heavens declare the glory of God.(Romans 1:20; Psalm 19:1). However, the Bible also states that men suppress the truth in unrighteousness [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%201:18;&version=49; (Romans 1:18)]. In short, those who do not acknowledge God are in a active state of denying what is clearly shown by nature.
 
The standard definition of atheism given by encyclopedias of philosophy which is the denial of the existence of God is a definition more in accordance with the biblical view of atheism.  Specifically, the Bible teaches that the creation clearly testifies of God and the heavens declare the glory of God.(Romans 1:20; Psalm 19:1). However, the Bible also states that men suppress the truth in unrighteousness [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%201:18;&version=49; (Romans 1:18)]. In short, those who do not acknowledge God are in a active state of denying what is clearly shown by nature.
2,002

edits

Navigation menu