Changes

:: Presenting both points doesn't make it a liberal puff piece!  It presented only one perspective (Focus on the Family), and referred to the Shepard incident as OVERBLOWN.  That's awful!!  I consider my entry a moderate tack, but if you can think of an acceptable compromise that preserves an unbiased perspective, be my guest.  It shocks me to see you go against your own commandments, though, about not including bias, and not importing a political perspective.  I have tried to, and continue to try to, do the same.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 02:13, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

:: Presenting both points doesn't make it a liberal puff piece!  It presented only one perspective (Focus on the Family), and referred to the Shepard incident as OVERBLOWN.  That's awful!!  I consider my entry a moderate tack, but if you can think of an acceptable compromise that preserves an unbiased perspective, be my guest.  It shocks me to see you go against your own commandments, though, about not including bias, and not importing a political perspective.  I have tried to, and continue to try to, do the same.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 02:13, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

:Instead of the http://www.citizenlink.org/CLFeatures/A000000562.cfm cite you may want to use this one [http://www.article8.org/docs/gay_strategies/after_the_ball.htm] This cite goes straight (NPI) to a section of the book ''After the Ball''.

:Instead of the http://www.citizenlink.org/CLFeatures/A000000562.cfm cite you may want to use this one [http://www.article8.org/docs/gay_strategies/after_the_ball.htm] This cite goes straight (NPI) to a section of the book ''After the Ball''. -)[[User:Cracker|Cracker]][[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]] 02:24, 12 March 2007 (EDT)