Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
10 bytes added ,  17:53, August 27, 2007
format infobox and make singular
Line 1: Line 1: −
{| border="1" align="right" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" width="250" style="margin-left:5px"
+
{| border="1" align="right" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" style="margin-left:5px"
−
|align="center" colspan="2"|[[Image:480px-Alberto Gonzales - official DoJ photograph.jpg|right|thumb|Alberto R. Gonzales]]
+
|align="center" colspan="2"|[[Image:480px-Alberto Gonzales - official DoJ photograph.jpg|225px|250px|Alberto R. Gonzales]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
!colspan="2" align="center" style="color: white; height: 30px; background: Indigo no-repeat scroll top left;"|Alberto Gonzales;
+
!colspan="2" align="center" style="color: white; height: 30px; background: Indigo no-repeat scroll top left;"|Alberto Gonzales<br/><small>80th Attorney General of the United States</small>
−
80th Attorney General of the United States
   
|-
 
|-
−
|Born
+
!Life
−
|August 4, 1955
+
|August 4, 1955 - &nbsp;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|Term
+
!Term
 
|February 3, 2005 - August 28, 2007
 
|February 3, 2005 - August 28, 2007
 
|-
 
|-
Line 23: Line 22:  
* Was instrumental in passing the [[Military Commissions Act]]
 
* Was instrumental in passing the [[Military Commissions Act]]
   −
== "Controversies" ==
+
==Controversy ==
 
Alberto Gonzales was the center of a controversy over the firings of 8 United States attorneys. Detractors insisted that the attorneys were fired for political reasons, instead of performance-based reasons (a claim that no one in the White House has ever made, though some Justice Department officials initially made this claim in Congressional testimony).<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/18/AR2007011801880.html</ref> Despite the fact that United States attorneys serve at the pleasure of the [[President of the United States]], and can be fired at any time for any reason, the [[Liberal bias|liberally biased]] media insists on calling it a scandal. So, even if the President did want to remove any United States attorney just because he or she was a Democrat, the President would be within his purview to do so. In fact, Alberto Gonzales "tempered the White House desire to replace U.S. Attorneys wholesale." <ref>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day24/archive/2007/03/23/alberto-gonzales-raw-deal.aspx</ref>
 
Alberto Gonzales was the center of a controversy over the firings of 8 United States attorneys. Detractors insisted that the attorneys were fired for political reasons, instead of performance-based reasons (a claim that no one in the White House has ever made, though some Justice Department officials initially made this claim in Congressional testimony).<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/18/AR2007011801880.html</ref> Despite the fact that United States attorneys serve at the pleasure of the [[President of the United States]], and can be fired at any time for any reason, the [[Liberal bias|liberally biased]] media insists on calling it a scandal. So, even if the President did want to remove any United States attorney just because he or she was a Democrat, the President would be within his purview to do so. In fact, Alberto Gonzales "tempered the White House desire to replace U.S. Attorneys wholesale." <ref>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day24/archive/2007/03/23/alberto-gonzales-raw-deal.aspx</ref>
 
During his testimony over this "Controversy", Mr. Gonzales stated 74 times that he could not recall various events relating to the situation.
 
During his testimony over this "Controversy", Mr. Gonzales stated 74 times that he could not recall various events relating to the situation.
SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436

edits

Navigation menu