5,175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + + + +
Talk:Human Rights Watch (view source)
Revision as of 01:59, August 29, 2007
, 01:59, August 29, 2007→Call for a substantial rewrite
*Human Rights Watch purports to be "strictly non-partisan" in orientation and maintains that it "does not favor any political force." In practice, HRW has often operated as a partisan organization, dressing up its decidedly leftwing political preferences in the language of human rights. [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6258]
*Human Rights Watch purports to be "strictly non-partisan" in orientation and maintains that it "does not favor any political force." In practice, HRW has often operated as a partisan organization, dressing up its decidedly leftwing political preferences in the language of human rights. [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6258]
:Or, seen in a different light, the left wing of the political spectrum puts more value on human rights than the right wing. Which is not to say that the right wing has no respect for human rights, but it tends to allow things like national security to be superior.
:I'm not trying to judge anybody's opinion, except for the opinion that HRW is "clearly" not what it says it is, "by all accounts." Sorry for the wishy-washyness, but sometimes there really are two sides no matter how distasteful the other side is. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 21:59, 28 August 2007 (EDT) ''<-doesn't taste very good either...''