Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: − + + +
Without dumbing it down, make it easier to understand
Sorry, this article is simply confusing. It gives an example of strong atheism which fits the definition of weak atheism.
Sorry, this article is simply confusing. It gives an example of strong atheism which fits the definition of weak atheism.
:"You don't know what you are talking about; therefore your statement carries no meaning; therefore you are not justified in believing it."
:"You don't know what you are talking about; therefore your statement carries no meaning; therefore you are not justified in believing it."
Isn't this the same thing as saying, "You didn't prove X, so I'm justifying in calling X false"? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:21, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
Isn't this the same thing as saying, "You didn't prove X, so I'm justifying in calling X false"?
As for the rest, the article is not easily understandable. Please try again. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:24, 28 August 2007 (EDT)