nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: +
Talk:Grand Canyon National Park (view source)
Revision as of 07:07, August 29, 2007
, 07:07, August 29, 2007→geology is NOT evolution!: Fixed, although your rationale was wrong.
It would be quite possible for a geologist to be an old-world creationist, so obviously, one can hold that the Grand Canyon is millions of years old, and was formed primarily by erosion, without being an "evolutionist". Can we get that straight once and for all?
It would be quite possible for a geologist to be an old-world creationist, so obviously, one can hold that the Grand Canyon is millions of years old, and was formed primarily by erosion, without being an "evolutionist". Can we get that straight once and for all?
[[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 21:59, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
[[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 21:59, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
:As far as the definition of "evolution" is concerned, see [[Definitions of evolution]], where you will see that it ''can'' be used to refer to things other than biological evolution. (To paraphrase, how many times are we going to see this denial that evolution can mean something other than biological evolution?) However, that may not apply so much for "evolutionist", and just because one wording is correct doesn't mean that it's the ''best'' wording, so I agree in this case and have changed it. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:07, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
== Proposed experiment for Grand Canyon formation ==
== Proposed experiment for Grand Canyon formation ==