Changes

4 I want conservapedia to be a success.  I would like for it to be a place where serious scholars can find information on every topic under Heaven, not a ghetto for echo-chamber seekers afraid of history, tradition, and reason.

4 I want conservapedia to be a success.  I would like for it to be a place where serious scholars can find information on every topic under Heaven, not a ghetto for echo-chamber seekers afraid of history, tradition, and reason.

Now having said that, I have a few questions:  Would it be acceptable to Karajou to have links in the Salvation article that lead to articles dealing with the other soteriological theories?  Would Karajou mind changing the "the" to an "a" because all of the major theories of how Salvation works are Biblical, they just rely on different passages of Scripture?  Since the conservative movement is so broad, is it right for this encyclepedia to limit the definition of Salvation to one not held by most conservative Christians?

Now having said that, I have a few questions:  Would it be acceptable to Karajou to have links in the Salvation article that lead to articles dealing with the other soteriological theories?  Would Karajou mind changing the "the" to an "a" because all of the major theories of how Salvation works are Biblical, they just rely on different passages of Scripture?  Since the conservative movement is so broad, is it right for this encyclepedia to limit the definition of Salvation to one not held by most conservative Christians?--[[User:Mattk|Mattk]] 16:24, 29 August 2007 (EDT)