Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
131 bytes added ,  02:08, August 30, 2007
Line 535: Line 535:  
::I've asked you this before, but naturally you didn't read it so I have to repeat myself: if I remove the United Nations from the definition do you agree with everything else? The United Nations is liberal (gasp!), but a discussion of its liberalness is more appropriate to the United Nations page. If you are ok with the rest of the definition I'd be happy to remove it and get on with my life. Maybe I'll actually have time to do some worthwhile edits to Conservapedia. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 19:46, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
 
::I've asked you this before, but naturally you didn't read it so I have to repeat myself: if I remove the United Nations from the definition do you agree with everything else? The United Nations is liberal (gasp!), but a discussion of its liberalness is more appropriate to the United Nations page. If you are ok with the rest of the definition I'd be happy to remove it and get on with my life. Maybe I'll actually have time to do some worthwhile edits to Conservapedia. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 19:46, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
 
:::I'll be happy to enter into a ''modus vivendi'' with you.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 20:39, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
 
:::I'll be happy to enter into a ''modus vivendi'' with you.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 20:39, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::About the UN, or about the whole definition? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 22:08, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
    
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==
 
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==
1,523

edits

Navigation menu