1,523
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 538:
Line 538: + + + +
→Another definition of liberal -2
::::About the UN, or about the whole definition? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 22:08, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
::::About the UN, or about the whole definition? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 22:08, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
:::::Does this definition state how the liberal organization, the United Nations, and others self described as liberals, ''actively opposed'' the removal the realist, Saddam Hussein? IOW, the liberal UN & liberals opposed human rights, opposed democracy, and supported a realist. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:45, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
:::::Does this definition state how the liberal organization, the United Nations, and others self described as liberals, ''actively opposed'' the removal the realist, Saddam Hussein? IOW, the liberal UN & liberals opposed human rights, opposed democracy, and supported a realist. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:45, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
<-- Sooooooo... what happened to the ''modus vivendi''?
I've asked you this before, but naturally you didn't read it so I have to repeat myself: if I remove the United Nations from the definition do you agree with everything else? The United Nations is liberal (gasp!), but a discussion of its liberalness is more appropriate to the United Nations page. If you are ok with the rest of the definition I'd be happy to remove it and get on with my life. Maybe I'll actually have time to do some worthwhile edits to Conservapedia. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 23:20, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==